Thursday, 25 May 2017

Models of Supervision

Models of Supervision

Models of Supervision; a brief overview
Models by Category
• Developmental Models
• Discrimination Model
• Orientation Specific Models
• Supervisory Alliance Model
• Interactional supervision
Developmental Models
Stoltentber and Delworth (1987) described a developmental model with three levels of supervisees
where the supervisor tailors her interventions and interactions based on the supervisee’s developmental level.
The levels are:
1. Self-and-other awareness
2. Motivation
3. Autonomy
Discrimination Model
Bernard’s (Bernard & Goodyear, 1992) purports to be “a-theoretical.) It combines an attention to three
supervisory roles with three areas of focus:
1. Supervisor’s role as teacher
2. Supervisor’s role as counselor
3. Supervisor’s role as consultant
Bernard’s three areas of focus for skill building are processconceptualization, and personalization.
1. Process examines communication between supervisee and client
2. Conceptualization is the supervisee’s application of theory, big picture overview, and reasons for next
steps
3. Personalization reviews the supervisee’s use of self in the therapeutic process.
Orientation Specific Models
Orientation specific models use the same theoretic models used to treat clients to work with supervisees, such
as:
1. Psychoanalytic supervision
2. Behavioral supervision
3. Rogerian supervision
4. Systemic supervision
Psychoanalytic Supervision is a stage model.
1.     Opening stage: assessing each other and looking for weakness. Supervisor wins


2. Middle stage: conflict, defensiveness, avoiding and attaching
3. Resolution stage is the working stage of supervision. The supervisor is mostly silent and encourages
the supervisee towards independence and autonomy.
Behavioral Supervision utilizes cognitive behavioral strategies. The problem is identified and the appropriate
technique to resolve the problem is selected. Supervisor models the technique and selectively reinforces the
supervisee, utilizing behavioral rehearsal with the supervisee.
In Rogerian Supervision, the therapist models the three primary Rogerian interventions
1. Empathy
2. Genuineness
3. Unconditional Positive Regard.
With Systemic Supervision the supervision should closely follow the theory. For structural supervision, clear
boundaries between supervisor and therapist must be maintained. For strategic supervisors, the supervisor
manipulates the supervisee’s behavior and once it is altered, the supervisor discusses it with the goal of the
supervisee gaining insight.
Supervisory Alliance Model
The model focuses on three roles of the supervisor:
1. Normative or managerial – Administrative tasks like adherence to policies and ethical codes.
2. Formative or educative – Teaching by determining supervisee’s strengths and weaknesses and then
forming lesson plans.
3. Restorative or supportive – reviews and explores client cases and the supervisee’s response.
Interactional Supervision
Lawrence Schulman’s Book: interactional Supervision, 3rd Edition is an excellent tool for utilizing this model,
comprehensive and has many case examples.
Five Core assumptions of Interaction Supervision
1. Interaction process between supervisor and supervisee is critical and determines the outcome
2. There are common elements to all supervision
3. There are universal dynamics and skills that apply.
4. There are parallels between supervision and other helping relationships.
5. The supervisor-supervisee working relationship is pivotal, it is through the relationship work occurs.
Schulman describes three stages of work:
1. Preparatory and Beginning Stage
2. Working Stage

3. Supervisory Ending and Transitions Stage

No comments:

Post a Comment

The difference between functional and dysfunctional conflict

Functional Conflicts Conflicts give us a chance to learn and develop. While each challenge lets us to be a problem solver in future, who...